← All Results
Domain History

kingservice.co.th

Grade C · 65/100 · 6/7 security headers present

Security Score

C
65/ 100

Security Headers

6/ 7

CSP Violations

NoViolations

Issues Found

9Issues

Recommendations

4Available

Security

65 / 100

Moderate security gaps found — unsafe directives or weak source restrictions.

Compliance

93 / 100

CSP implementation follows recommended standards and specifications.

Best Practices

35 / 100

Few best practices adopted — significant room for improvement.

CSP Analysis

Content Security PolicyHIGH
default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://*.wp.com https://*.wordpress.com https://www.google-analytics.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://*.wp.com https://fonts.googleapis.com; font-src 'self' data: https://fonts.gstatic.com; img-src 'self' data: https://*.wp.com https://*.wordpress.com https://s.w.org; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'none'; upgrade-secure-requests;
Directive Analysis
default-srcLOW
self
script-srcHIGH
self unsafe-inline unsafe-eval https://*.wp.com https://*.wordpress.com https://www.google-analytics.com
•Unsafe inline execution allowed in script-src
•Unsafe eval() execution allowed in script-src
•No nonces or hashes used for script-src
style-srcHIGH
self unsafe-inline https://*.wp.com https://fonts.googleapis.com
•Unsafe inline execution allowed in style-src
font-srcLOW
self data: https://fonts.gstatic.com
•Info: 'data:' URI in font-src
img-srcLOW
self data: https://*.wp.com https://*.wordpress.com https://s.w.org
•Info: 'data:' URI in img-src
object-srcLOW
none
frame-ancestorsLOW
none
upgrade-secure-requestsLOW
Missing Directives
⚠HIGHMissing HIGH directive base-uri (Base URI control - prevents base tag injection)
⚠MEDIUMMissing MEDIUM directive form-action (Form submission control - prevents form hijacking)
⚠MEDIUMMissing MEDIUM directive connect-src (API/XHR control - prevents data exfiltration)

Security Headers

✓Cross-Origin-Opener-PolicyPresent

unsafe-none

Isolates the browsing context to prevent Spectre-type side-channel attacks and cross-origin window manipulation.

✓Permissions-PolicyPresent

camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()

Restricts which browser features (camera, microphone, geolocation) the page can use, limiting attack surface.

✓Referrer-PolicyPresent

strict-origin-when-cross-origin

Controls how much referrer information is sent with requests, preventing data leaks to third parties.

✓Strict-Transport-SecurityPresent

max-age=31536000

Forces browsers to use HTTPS for all future requests, preventing man-in-the-middle attacks and SSL stripping.

✓X-Content-Type-OptionsPresent

nosniff

Prevents browsers from MIME-sniffing responses away from the declared Content-Type, blocking drive-by downloads.

✓X-Frame-OptionsPresent

sameorigin

Prevents the page from being embedded in iframes, protecting against clickjacking attacks.

—X-XSS-ProtectionDeprecated

Legacy XSS filter for older browsers. Modern browsers use CSP instead. Set to "0" to avoid false positives.

Issues Found

  • •Info: 'data:' URI in font-srcinfo
  • •Info: 'data:' URI in img-srcinfo
  • •Missing HIGH directive base-uri (Base URI control - prevents base tag injection)high
  • •Missing MEDIUM directive connect-src (API/XHR control - prevents data exfiltration)medium
  • •Missing MEDIUM directive form-action (Form submission control - prevents form hijacking)medium
  • •No nonces or hashes used for script-srcmedium
  • •Unsafe eval() execution allowed in script-srchigh
  • •Unsafe inline execution allowed in script-srchigh
  • •Unsafe inline execution allowed in style-srchigh

Recommendations

  • →Add base-uri directive with appropriate restrictions
  • →Add connect-src directive with appropriate restrictions
  • →Add form-action directive with appropriate restrictions
  • →Consider implementing a stricter Content Security Policy

Beyond headers: infrastructure exposure

via OSN, our sister project

Security headers protect the browser. OSN maps what's exposed underneath — servers, open ports, known CVEs, DNS and WHOIS.

See what the internet sees about kingservice.co.th

kingservice.co.th

2 scans since 7/8/2026

C

Latest: 65/100

Total Scans

2

Latest Score

65/100

First Scan

7/8/2026

Last Scan

7/8/2026

Security

65 / 100

Moderate security gaps found — unsafe directives or weak source restrictions.

Compliance

93 / 100

CSP implementation follows recommended standards and specifications.

Best Practices

35 / 100

Few best practices adopted — significant room for improvement.

Score Trend

Security score progression over 2 scans

Scan History

DateScoreCSPHeadersIssuesAction
Jul 8, 2026
C (65)
Yes
6/79View →
Jul 8, 2026
C (60)
Yes
6/711View →

Show off your security grade

Embed this badge on your site or README. It updates automatically after each scan and links back to this report.

HeaderTest security grade: C (65/100) for kingservice.co.th
HTML
<a href="https://headertest.com/results/kingservice.co.th" title="Security headers grade for kingservice.co.th — HeaderTest">
  <img src="https://headertest.com/api/badge/kingservice.co.th" alt="HeaderTest security grade: C (65/100) for kingservice.co.th" />
</a>
Markdown
[![HeaderTest security grade: C (65/100) for kingservice.co.th](https://headertest.com/api/badge/kingservice.co.th)](https://headertest.com/results/kingservice.co.th)